Thursday, February 07, 2019

Public prosecutors come up with: the oral trial of 12/2 is a fair trial


Carlos Jiménez Villarejo. Federalistes de Esquerres.
 
Given the aggressive drift of such a magnitude and territorial scope, it is necessary to bear in mind the position maintained by the Progressive Union of Prosecutors towards the independence procés

The judiciary branch, in the face of the incoming trial against the pro-independence leaders, is living in Catalonia through the anxiety and uneasiness generated by the brutal attacks against the premises of courts and public prosecutors’ offices,  permitted, if not clearly sponsored, by the Catalan political authorities. How many times have they not stimulated the violent actions of the so-called committees for the defence of the republic (CDR)?  What naïveté!

A republic, in lowercase: because neither exists nor will it exist. However, with a radically antidemocratic activism, which should be prosecuted criminally, like the brutal aggressions of these days; these aggressions could be considered as the crime against the judicial power provided for in art. 508.2 of the Criminal Code,  if the impulse or support of the politicians is credited, on whom, ultimately, they depend. This, of course, would not be so difficult. It is enough to remember the words of the  'vicari' Torra to the CDRs: "Push, you do well in pressing". It is as much intolerable the throwing of excrements against the Prosecutor's Office and the courts, and the graffiti 'Spanish Justice reeks of fascist shit' (in Catalan), as it is the silence of the Govern and, especially, of the Minister of Justice, Ester Capella, who, thanks to her silence, is completely delegitimized for the exercise of her position.

Given the aggressive drift of such a magnitude and territorial scope, it is necessary to keep in mind, today more than ever, the position held by the Progressive Union of Prosecutors towards the independence procés. Position that they already expressed against the ignominious and antidemocratic parliamentary sessions of 6 and 7 September, 2017: "Thus, the Spanish Constitution is clearly violated, approved by the immense majority of the citizens of Spain and also of Catalonia. They also infringed the provisions of the Statute of Catalonia. Nor do they conform to the terms and recommendations of the Venice Commission of the Council of Europe, nor do they have any protection under any international treaty or in the UN resolutions on the right of self-determination, applicable to certain situations completely different from the one existing in Catalonia and the rest of Spain".

Position more than justified and necessary, when the then leader and now accused Jordi Turull cited in the sentence of the pillaging of the Palau de la Música dared to say defiantly, faced with the call of 1-O: "We will vote and win! The state has the sewers, the TC and the prosecutors". He was one of those who wanted to govern Catalonia! But the aggressive pro-independence speech comes from far back. The member of Parliament from the CUP Benet Salellas said that "legality is to be surpassed, and the disobedience must be massive". And the Catalan National Assembly demanded "unlimited camping", "passive resistance", "fiscal insubordination", "occupation of infrastructures" or "the protection of television and public radio stations if there is a cut in communications".
However, more recently, the progressive prosecutors have again pronounced, in a letter addressed to the French judiciary power, on the not only illegal but also criminal character of the procés that justifies the criminal trial that will soon begin. They state that "the investigated facts are as relevant and transcendental as an institutional rebellion against the Constitution and the rest of the legal system”; this rebellion became a reality "in September of 2017, [when] they decided to pass several laws in the Catalan Parliament,  even against the legal opinion of the lawyers of that same Parliament; the ultimate goal of these laws was the creation of a state independent of the Spanish territory; and the means to achieve it included the unilateral segregation, through the call of a referendum, a competence not allowed by the Constitution to any autonomous community; this competence was usurped by them through the Law 19/2017 of September 6, on the referendum of self-determination, whose article 4 provided that the result of the referendum would be binding, as well as that, if in the recount of votes there would be more votes in favor than against, then the result would automatically imply the independence of Catalonia”.
And they state, with determination, that "the pro-independence leaders who are subjected to a trial in Spain repeatedly disobeyed the orders of the Constitutional Court,  called a banned and illegal referendum,  and without any legal, juridical or even social basis at all. And for this, they used all the administrative apparatus for which they were responsible, and omitted all previous warnings from their own lawyers, from the Spanish Executive, from the ordinary courts or from the constitutional court itself”. And they reiterate: "The accused persons subverted the constitutional order, they invented roads outside the law or the constitution, they transgressed consciously, continuously and intentionally the legal order to dismember the State, to separate from Spain".

And they add, as an expression of the annulment of the democratic principle of division of powers that has always presided over their performance: "If we analyze the acts of the people subjected to the Spanish trial, we see that these champions of democracy are asking the president of the Spanish Government to change the structure of the state, right away, immediately and personally, as if in a modern state the sole will of the chief of the Executive could modify the territorial integrity, the form of government and the structure of the nation. They are asking the chief of the Executive to tell the judges to stop persecuting those who proclaimed the Catalan republic, as if in a modern state the executive power could give commands to the judiciary power. They are asking the chief of the Executive that the Prosecutor's Office should not prosecute the defendants, in a country like ours in which the Government's relationship with the General Public Prosecutor ends at the very moment she is appointed".

These are, in summary, the facts. How could they claim that these facts lacked criminal consequences? Yes; they were set out to nothing more and nothing less than "an illegal target that [represented] splitting in two the political reality and the coexistence of a whole country."

This was confirmed by the last statements of the current 'vicar' of Catalonia  on Septiember, 5:: "We will not accept any sentence other than the definitive closure of an unjust cause, and this I want to say with all solemnity and with all determination". Of course, with the same determination which he applies to prove his ineptitude and ignorance.

And the progressive prosecutors conclude: "Spanish judges do not do politics; they investigate and, if this be the case, then they will judge facts that have already happened; and they are not responsible for the acts committed by others, nor can they protect the offender of the law”.

* Carlos Jiménez Villarejo. Federalistes de Esquerres.


Share:

0 comentarios:

Post a Comment

Highlighted

Trials of Catalan activists - the what the why and how great academic centers are unwittingly contributing to undermining a European democracy

Twelve former Catalan politicians and activists are currently facing trial before the Spanish Supreme Court for charges ranging from m...

Blog Archive